820-00928-A spillage of liquid No power no charge

tipoti

Member
are you kidding me :) :) ??? my problem is not answering my questions :)

" The value of R3033/34 appears as 100k and no stuff in the diagram, but there are these parts on the motherboard and when I measure it, the values are 0 ohms. When I remove the R3033/34 and measure its 1st pin with ground, there is no short circuit. 0.504 shows up in diode mode. Is the value of these resistors really 0 or should it be 100k as written in the diagram? "

" r3033 is in place and shows short circuit. the diagram shows the value as 100k. I did not understand this situation. Is it normal for it to be short circuited or should I replace it with another 100k resistor? "
 

tipoti

Member
" The value of R3033/34 appears as 100k and no stuff in the diagram, but there are these parts on the motherboard and when I measure it, the values are 0 ohms. When I remove the R3033/34 and measure its 1st pin with ground, there is no short circuit. 0.504 shows up in diode mode. Is the value of these resistors really 0 or should it be 100k as written in the diagram? "

" r3033 is in place and shows short circuit. the diagram shows the value as 100k. I did not understand this situation. Is it normal for it to be short circuited or should I replace it with another 100k resistor? "
 

2informaticos

Administrator
Staff member
I can't believe this :(.

""I guess you didn't read what I wrote."
Yeah, I do NOT see any mention about R3034 in your previous post!
Did YOU read what you've wrote?

I don't have 00928 board on hand now.
But I can confirm with 00281; the same resistors are used for the same signals.
R3033 is soldered and has 0 ohm; also R3034.

BTW, R3035/36 can't be present in this case."

Wrote almost 45 minutes ago...
 

tipoti

Member
I found the cause of the confusion. :) When I read it, there was no text at the bottom, only the top, I guess, then you edited it. Since I did not refresh the page again, I only read the text at the top. the confusion was :)

When I wrote this, "it says r3033 is not in place. But r3033 is in place and shows short circuit" in the first reply to me "Compare R3033/34 and their lines to ground in diode mode." why ?
"R3033 is soldered and has 0 ohms; also R3034." You said you were, why didn't you say that in your first reply?

I ordered CD3215A. We'll continue when it comes
 

Attachments

  • 2.alan.JPG
    2.alan.JPG
    53.8 KB · Views: 0

2informaticos

Administrator
Staff member
My first reply was in half indeed.
Because your previous reply was realy strange for me: "I guess you didn't read what I wrote."
I make errors myself too, but I try to check first when someone points that.

I completed the post 2-3 minutes later, after I found the 00281 scrap board for checking...
 
Last edited:

tipoti

Member
I changed the CD3215A, the result is the same, it draws 0.01A amps, does not charge and does not turn on
 

2informaticos

Administrator
Staff member
It should get PPBUS_G3H at least, without battery.
Testing with battery in this case may help to see if there is other problem, apart of USB-C area.
 

tipoti

Member
F7000= PPBUS_G3H =no voltage

no voltage with or without battery

I read 5 volts on FB201, shouldn't it be 20 volts here?
 
Last edited:

2informaticos

Administrator
Staff member
Seems that your board suffered more damage than expected; because of liquid spill.
You still have problems on UB300/400 area, but also somewhere else.
Possibly SMC got bad, if you don't get PPBUS_G3H at all; nor even with battery connected.
 

tipoti

Member
I understand that the absence of PPBUS_G3H has nothing to do with CBs. you say PPBUS_G3H should be output anyway, but is this a definite SMC problem?
in a similar problem, smc and 4xCB were changed, the problem was not resolved

 

tipoti

Member
There was corrosion in the u2890 area. And the r2890 was not in place. I had cleaned that area before and replaced the r2890. Could the R2890 be broken?

 
Top